“If you go back to 1912, every time the legislature came up with a revenue projection, guess how much was spent? All of it, it always all gets spent, whether it’s on a road or on education or on a tax cut, because a tax cut goes under the cost category because it lowers your revenue,” he said. “Everything gets spent. Conservatives will tend to spend it on tax cuts. Democrats will focus on social programs on the ends, but in the center where we kinda line up will be K-12, transportation, public safety, and we can usually find a lot of agreement there.”
On the aforementioned ESA program, it’s been a focus on Democratic lawmakers to significantly reign in the program, which currently has 74,822 students and growing. The reality is that it is an election year, and the narrow majorities in both chambers could result in a tied or even narrow Democratic-majority legislature, which could leave Hobbs with a united government to make drastic changes on education and a range of other issues.
“The ESA community seems to be pretty dialed in for the most part. I imagine there’s some people who aren’t as informed. They seem to be pretty informed. I think they know if we lose the legislature, the ESA program will be gone in Arizona. I also don’t think we lose the legislature,” he said.
When it comes to the border, Republicans sent House Concurrent Resolution 2060 to the ballot in November in hopes of making it a state crime to cross into Arizona through an illegal international entry point. The Senate President said if there’s a rightward shift in border policy federally, especially if former President Donald Trump takes office, that he says it would be easier to accomplish conservative goals on the issue.
“Instead of acrimony, you’ll see collaboration. And so you’ll see more, state and local, working closely with federal instead of federal literally trying to stop state and local from enforcing laws that they’re failing to enforce. It’s bizarre, like, what kind of a twilight zone are we in? Where government is not only enforcing a law, they’re trying to stop somebody else from enforcing the law. It is totally bizarre.”
However, the most headline-grabbing moment in the legislature was the effort by Democrats to repeal the near-total abortion ban law first created in 1864 and recodified in the 1970s that could have become enforceable based on a state Supreme Court ruling in the spring.
Emotions ran high at the capitol for weeks, but the repeal ultimately made it to Hobbs’ desk after all Democrats and a handful of Republicans in both chambers voted for the bill. Petersen said his primary focus was “unity” but said it was a “highly partisan and highly charged issue” that brought out “the worst of people, unfortunately, really on both sides of the aisle.”
“My focus was really just trying to be respectful to each other,” he said.
“My focus was ‘How can we navigate through this?’ And without deep wounds that, you know, we have a one-vote majority, we’ve gotta hold the majority. I don’t want it to get so, so much rancor that it just completely blows up the caucus. It was hard and it was difficult. It got pretty tense, but… We’re in a decent place right now,” the Republican added.
Story by Cameron Arcand